Introduction to Citizen
Proposals for PDK Master Plan Policies (September 2005)
These four proposals are
the ones that concerned citizens feel are most essential
to be adopted by the DeKalb County Board of Commissioners,
in addition to any other policies that they may see
fit to adopt from the
PDK
Airport Advisory Board (AAB) June 2005 policy recommendations or from the
PDK Master Plan Policy
Consultant policy recommendations.
These four policy proposals from citizens are vital because they provide
concrete guidance and limitations as to how PDK Airport shall be developed
in the future, unlike many of the more general policy recommendations
from the AAB or the Master Plan Consultants.
The first of these citizen policy proposals--that PDK Airport remain
a "general aviation" CII Airport and that no engineering changes
be adopted that could make it capable of becoming a CIII commercial
airport, able to handle much larger aircraft--is absolutely essential
in the view of concerned citizens. Everybody from the PDK Airport Association,
representing the pilots, to PDK Watch says they support PDK remaining
a CII general aviation airport. If so, then this policy should be stated
explicitly for the benefit of those planning for the future of PDK Airport.
The second citizen policy proposal--that there shall be no expansion
of current PDK Airport boundaries, except under certain specified conditions--is
taken directly from the 1992 PDK Master Plan policy statement. Without
the retention of this policy provision, PDK Airport might expand its
boundaries in ways that could prove detrimental to the surrounding communities.
The third of these citizen policy proposals asks that steps be taken
to create mandatory and enforceable measures to direct aircraft using
PDK to use flight paths and flight heights that reduce the noise, safety,
and other environmental hazards to the surrounding communities over
which the aircraft fly. Without the development of such mandatory and
enforceable provisions, the current scatter gun pattern of aircraft
flights disrupting surrounding communities can be expected to continue.
For example, jets using PDK Airport should not be allowed to bank barely
above treetop level when they are between 3 and 4 miles away from PDK
Airport over residential neighborhoods, as is currently the case.
The fourth citizen policy proposal--that DeKalb County and PDK Airport
abide by the 66,000 lb. limit for aircraft using
PDK --is based on the contractually binding promises that the County
made to the FAA and to the public in 1988. These promises were the basis
for Federal Court of Appeals ruling in 1988 that a 1,000 foot runway
extension could be constructed without conducting a federally required
Environmental Impact Study first. The reasoning was that since the County
was promising that planes larger than the then-existing 66,000 lb. "certified maximum takeoff weight" limit would not be
allowed to use PDK Airport in the future, there was no need for a Environmental
Impact Statement to consider what the future impact of such larger aircraft
might be.
Of course, there are other PDK Airport policies that citizens also
feel are important beside the four mentioned above, but these four are
the most critically important. There also are certain policy proposals
and wording in both the AAB and the Master Plan Consultant policy recommendations
that concerned citizens feel need modification. We are convinced, however,
that these four key citizen policy recommendations would go a long way
towards accomplishing the goal of achieving a proper balance between
airport and citizen concerns for the development of PDK Airport, which
is supported as a goal in the PDK mission statement.